In Abeokuta last Friday, governors,
leaders of the National Assembly and political heavy weights gathered to lay
the foundation stone of a mosque at the Olusegun Obasanjo Presidential
Library (OOPL) complex.
Even former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, who
has had a bitter political battle with former President Obasanjo
attended the event and donated N5 million towards the project.
Conspicuously absent was President
Goodluck Jonathan. He was not there in person. He was not represented by any
minister or presidential aide.
President Jonathan’s absence at an
event that touches the heart of his benefactor is one of the manifestations of
the divide between the two leaders.
Obasanjo it was who influenced
Jonathan’s political rise as Deputy Governor of Bayelsa State, through
Governor, Vice President, Acting President, substantive President and
Jonathan’s election as president in the 2011 elections. Though unspoken, the
feud is now in the open, like a festering wound.
Obasanjo, on his part, has kept away
from the Aso Rock Presidential Villa in the last few months. He didn’t attend
the last Council of State meeting in July. His voice was not heard sympathising
or commiserating with the first family over the illness of Dame Patience Jonathan
and the death of Jonathan’s younger brother, the late Meni, respectively.
Instead, the volley of attacks and counter-attacks directly and by proxy has
replaced the filial relationship between them.
Obasanjo even dumped his position as
chairman of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) board of trustees – a position
he fought very hard to keep. Ever since that decision, things continued to fall
apart between the two.
How Jonathan and
Obasanjo fell apart
The crack between Jonathan and Obasanjo began to emerge shortly after the 2011 presidential election. A close associate of Obasanjo revealed to Sunday Trust that after the bitter battle before, during and after the polls, Obasanjo asked Jonathan to mend the divide between the North and South by visiting those who contested against him in the presidential primaries and the election.
The crack between Jonathan and Obasanjo began to emerge shortly after the 2011 presidential election. A close associate of Obasanjo revealed to Sunday Trust that after the bitter battle before, during and after the polls, Obasanjo asked Jonathan to mend the divide between the North and South by visiting those who contested against him in the presidential primaries and the election.
But Jonathan refused to do so.
Secondly, it was alleged that Obasanjo warned Jonathan against reducing the
presidency to an Ijaw affair, when it was apparent that the president had surrounded
himself with his kinsmen, some of them ex-militants. Again, Jonathan
ignored him.
Then, when Jonathan wanted to
constitute his cabinet, it was gathered, Obasanjo recommended some names from
the South-West, considering the fact that the region which voted for Jonathan
overwhelmingly had no governor. Sunday Trust gathered that Obasanjo was shocked
when Jonathan threw away his list, and the South-West did not make it to any of
the top 10 cabinet positions.
Combined with the suspicion that
Jonathan may have deliberately traded the South-West governorship positions
with Asiwaju Bola Tinubu’s Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN) to enable him win
the presidential election, Obasanjo felt used and dumped. To worsen the
situation, it was alleged that the president stopped picking Obasanjo’s calls.
Obasanjo turns critic
of Jonathan administration
Indications that Obasanjo accepted his
maltreatment and was looking in a different direction, perhaps, to take his
pound of flesh, manifested in reports alleging that he was looking North-ward
for Jonathan’s replacement, come 2015.
Though he denied ever endorsing Jigawa
State Governor Sule Lamido and Rivers State Governor Rotimi Amaechi as his
choices for the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP’s) presidential flag bearers in
2015, Obasanjo’s body language told the world that he had shifted his support
from Jonathan.
At local and international fora,
he took a swipe on the Jonathan administration for wasting the country’s
foreign reserve, put at about $35 billion in 2007. Obasanjo had said, “We left
what we call excess crude, let’s build it for rainy day, up to $35 billion;
within three years, the $35 billion disappeared. Whether the money disappeared
or, like the governor said, it was shared, the fact remains that $35 billion
disappeared from the foreign reserve I left behind in office. When we left that
money, we thought we were leaving it for the rainy day… But my brother said the
rain is not falling now.
But the fact is that when the rain is
falling, we will have nothing to cover our heads with because we have blown it
off. The Chinese do not think that way.” The statement was an allusion to the
Jonathan administration, as both foreign reserve and excess crude account sank
shortly after the 2011 elections.Obasanjo’s statements became more and more
critical of the Jonathan administration.
On November 11, he spoke in Dakar,
Senegal about the alarming rate of unemployment in the country, and concluded
that the country was sitting on a time-bomb.
He told the gathering at an entrepreneurship
programme under the auspices of that Organisation for Economic Cooperation and
Development (OECD) and the African Development Bank that when he became
president, youth unemployment was put at 72 per cent, but that he reduced it to
about 52 per cent.
Now, it has ballooned to unmanageable
proportion. Obasanjo underscored his fears with this remark: “I am afraid. And
when a General says he is afraid, that means the danger ahead is real and
potent. Despite the imminent threat to Nigeria’s nationhood there is no
serious, realistic short or long term solution to youth unemployment.”
Though Obasanjo argued that his remarks
were not meant to instigate Nigerians against government, few days after the
Dakar event, he was in Warri, Delta State to frontally attack Jonathan over his
‘weak’ approach to insecurity.
At the 40th anniversary of Pastor Ayo
Oritsejafor’s call to ministry at the Word of Life Bible Church, Obasanjo said,
“They (Boko Haram) stated their grievances and I promised to relay them to the
authorities in power, because that was the best I could do. I did report. But
my fear at that time is still my fear till today. When you have a sore and fail
to attend to it quickly, it festers and grows to become something else.
“Whichever way, you just have to attend
to it. Don’t leave it unattended to. On two occasions I had to attend to the
problem I faced at that time. I sent soldiers to a place and 19 of them were
killed. If I had allowed that to continue, I will not have authority to send
security whether police, soldier and any force any where again. So, I had to
nip it in the bud and that was the end of that particular problem.”
Referring to criticisms that he foisted
Jonathan on the nation, Obasanjo said, “The beauty of democracy is that power
rests in the people, and every elected person would seek your votes to come
back; if you don’t want him, he won’t come back.”
Jonathan fires back
Obasanjo’s reference to how he tackled the Odi crisis attracted a length remark from Jonathan during the presidential media chat on Sunday, November 18. The tragedy, which happened on November 20, 1999 led to the killing of many persons in the Bayelsa State community.
Though Obasanjo said it halted
militants’ attacks on the army, Jonathan disagreed, bluntly saying, “When the Odi
matter came up, I was the Deputy Governor of Bayelsa State, and I can give you
the narratives of what led to the Odi crisis. The peak of the activities of the
militancy in Niger Delta was when 12 police officers were killed in a cold
blooded murder. That made the federal government to invade Odi. And after that
invasion, the governor and I visited Odi.
“Ordinarily, the governor and the
deputy governor were not supposed to move together under such a situation. And
we saw some dead people mainly old men and women and also children.
None of those militants was killed.
None was killed. So, bombarding Odi was to solve the problem but it never
solved it. If the attack on Odi had solved the issue of militancy in the Niger
Delta, the Yar’adua government, in which I had the privilege of being the Vice
President, wouldn’t have come up with the amnesty programme.
So, that should tell you that the
attack on Odi never solved the militancy problems. People will even tell you
that rather it escalated it. It attracted international sympathy and we had
lots of challenges after that attack on Odi.”
Implications of the
face-off for 2015:
Obasanjo does not forgive. Obasanjo has
always had the last laugh. These two expressions have become aphorisms in the
Nigerian political circle because of some antecedents.
Many politicians who attracted
Obasanjo’s anger regretted it. Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar; former
Ogun State Governor, Otunba Gbenga Daniel; former Speaker Umar Gha’li Na’Abbah,
former Senate President Anyim Pius Anyim; the late Senate President Pius
Okadigbo, former PDP National Chairman, Chief Audu Ogbeh and even the late
President Umaru Musa Yar’adua were not spared. In different ways they disagreed
with Obasanjo. In different ways they lost out.
As the political alignment for 2015
intensifies, there are fears that the Obasanjo group could pull the rug off
Jonathan’s 2015 ambition. In Abeokuta last Friday, many governors from the
North, some of whom have presidential ambition, engaged in a closed door
meeting with Obasanjo after they contributed to the fund for building the
presidential library mosque. If anything, the harmony demonstrated at the
meeting pointed to the reality of power shift from the South to the North, a
change that Obasanjo has openly canvassed for.
The big alliance being planned by the
All Nigeria Peoples Party (ANPP), the Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN) and the
Congress for Progressive Change (CPC) would provide a veritable alternative to
dissenting groups in the PDP, if Jonathan picks the party’s ticket for 2015
presidential election.
In his reaction to the face-off between
Jonathan and Obasanjo, the National Publicity Secretary of the Conference of
Nigeria Political Parties (CNPP), Mr Osita Okechukwu, described it as ‘nemesis
at work’.The divide between Jonathan and Obasanjo may influence the country’s
future political leadership. An intense power struggle may be in the offing in
2015.
source:africansportlight.com